Employer Retaliation

Workplace Retaliation Attorney in Philadelphia

Labor-Law Depth Where General Employment Firms Fall Short

Retaliation claims look different depending on the workplace. For a union member, it may mean disciplinary action timed to an organizing drive or a grievance filing. For a nonunion employee, it may follow a wage complaint or a safety report. At Goodley McCarthy LLC, our practice is rooted in Philadelphia labor law. We represent workers across both settings, handling retaliation that arises from union activity, protected concerted action under the National Labor Relations Act, and employment-law matters that intersect with labor issues like wage backlash or discriminatory discipline.

Retaliation often surfaces through shifts that feel hard to name: reduced hours, reassigned duties, exclusion from communications, or a sudden negative review after you assert protected rights. Workers facing these changes often aren’t sure whether what happened qualifies legally. An early conversation with our firm can clarify your options and help protect time-sensitive rights before deadlines pass. We serve clients across Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York.

Don’t let filing deadlines close your options. Call (215) 273-3491 or contact us online to schedule a confidential consultation with a retaliation lawyer in Philadelphia.

Retaliation Claims We Handle in Philadelphia

Our primary focus is union members, organizers, and employees asserting concerted activity rights under the NLRA. We also handle select employment-law retaliation matters where labor protections are at stake. Claim types within our practice include:

  • Wage-and-hour retaliation after collective complaints, wage theft reports, or organizing drives
  • Whistleblower and safety complaints in union and nonunion workplaces
  • NLRB charges and unfair labor practice proceedings, including representation election matters before NLRB Region 4
  • Disputes implicating both collective bargaining agreements and local protections under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act and the Philadelphia Fair Practices Ordinance

The NLRA protects not just union members but any employee engaging in protected concerted activity, including nonunion workers who collectively raise workplace concerns. The Pennsylvania Human Relations Act and the Philadelphia Fair Practices Ordinance layer additional anti-retaliation protections on top of federal law, giving Philadelphia employees additional avenues to pursue relief beyond federal statutes alone. Retaliation protections also apply when the original complaint turns out to be unfounded, as long as the employee held a good-faith, reasonable belief of wrongdoing. Strategy options include NLRB charges, grievance arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement, and claims before the Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations.

What to Expect When You Contact a Retaliation Attorney in Philadelphia

Retaliation claims move on tight timelines. NLRB unfair labor practice charges generally must be filed within six months of the adverse act, and PHRA and EEOC charges carry their own separate deadlines. Missing these windows can bar a claim entirely, which is why we structure our process to move quickly from initial contact to protective action.

  1. Initial consultation: We listen to your account, identify which labor or employment laws apply, and outline realistic options without pressure.
  2. Evaluation of your rights: We assess contractual, statutory, and NLRB-based protections that may apply, including rights under your collective bargaining agreement if one governs your workplace.
  3. Action plan tailored to your situation: We recommend the appropriate path, whether that’s an NLRB charge, grievance arbitration, administrative agency escalation, or a combination of remedies.
  4. Consistent communication: You receive timely updates and direct attorney access throughout the process.

Philadelphia’s layered legal framework, spanning federal statutes, Pennsylvania law, and city ordinances, gives employees here additional protections beyond those available under federal law alone. Being based in Philadelphia means we understand how the NLRB’s regional office, the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, and the Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations each handle these matters in practice.

Immediate Steps When a Retaliation Claim Is Active

When a client comes to us following an adverse action, we move quickly. That typically means filing NLRB charges before deadlines close, preserving grievance rights under any applicable collective bargaining agreement, and collecting witness statements and documentary evidence while recollections are fresh. We coach clients on documenting adverse actions contemporaneously, with dates, supervisors involved, and any witnesses present, because that record can significantly support a claim. We also advise on what not to do: workers who haven’t been terminated should generally not resign before consulting an attorney, as that decision can affect available remedies. Where union and legal remedies both apply, we coordinate them together rather than pursuing each in isolation.

Time matters in retaliation cases. Fill out our online form to connect with a workplace retaliation attorney in Philadelphia and start protecting your rights.

Why Philadelphia Workers Choose Goodley McCarthy LLC

Our practice is built around one side of the employment relationship: workers. We don’t represent employers, and our labor-law foundation means we bring depth to retaliation claims, particularly in union settings, NLRB proceedings, and disputes tied to collective bargaining.

  • Labor-Centered Focus: Our core practice is employee and union representation in labor disputes, collective bargaining matters, and workplace protections under Pennsylvania and federal law. Retaliation claims that intersect with labor rights are where we work every day.
  • Deep Local Roots: Both founding partners, James E. Goodley and Ryan P. McCarthy, were born, raised, and educated in the Philadelphia region. That background shapes how we navigate NLRB Region 4, local agencies, and Philadelphia’s municipal protections.
  • Union Partnerships: We collaborate directly with labor organizations, giving us practical knowledge of how collective bargaining agreements function and how union grievance processes interact with statutory retaliation claims.
  • Demonstrated Track Record: Our results include a $2,488,474.62 False Claims Act judgment in IBEW Local Union No. 98 v. Farfield Co., affirmed by the Third Circuit, and a $4 million class action settlement covering more than 500 class members in the Vox Media wage and hour litigation.
  • Direct Access and Plain-Language Guidance: Clients receive virtual consultations, direct attorney access, and straightforward explanations of their options throughout the process.

With over a decade of experience focused on employee and labor rights, Goodley McCarthy LLC handles retaliation claims from the initial charge through resolution, whether that path runs through the NLRB, a grievance arbitration, or the courts.

  • Thousands of Class Members Served
    When it comes to your legal representation, experience matters. Our track record of victories speaks volumes about our commitment to our clients. Let us navigate the legal complexities for you.
  • Over a Decade of Legal Experience

    Our seasoned team specializes in class action employment litigation, providing top-tier representation to support your case. Our firm delivers dedicated legal counsel, fueled by years of collective experience, integrity, and a commitment to achieving the best outcomes.

  • Meet with Us Virtually
    Seamlessly connect with our legal experts from the comfort of your home or office. Your convenience is our priority, and we're dedicated to providing comprehensive legal support on your terms
  • Exclusively Dedicated to Employees
    Devoted to championing the rights of employees, our firm focuses solely on providing legal support and representation for workers. We're here to stand by you and fight for fairness, in the workplace.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Counts as Workplace Retaliation in Philadelphia?

Retaliation includes any adverse employment action taken because an employee complained about unlawful conduct or asserted a legal right. That covers demotion, pay reduction, termination, harassment, schedule changes, and exclusion from opportunities. The law protects workers who make good-faith reports even when the underlying complaint is later found unsubstantiated, as long as the employee reasonably believed wrongdoing occurred.

Which Laws Protect Philadelphia Employees from Retaliation?

Multiple statutes apply and often overlap. The National Labor Relations Act covers protected concerted activity and union organizing. The Pennsylvania Human Relations Act and the Philadelphia Fair Practices Ordinance add anti-retaliation protections on top of federal law. The Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law protects public employees and employees of publicly funded organizations who report wrongdoing. Which statute applies depends on the nature of the protected activity and the employer. An attorney can identify which frameworks may support your claim.

Does Retaliation Require Termination?

No. Any adverse employment action taken in response to protected activity can constitute retaliation. Discipline, demotion, a pay cut, a hostile reassignment, or a pattern of exclusion may all qualify depending on the circumstances. The key question is whether the employer acted because of protected activity, not how severe the action was.

Can Union Members Bring Retaliation Claims Separate from a Grievance?

Yes. Union members can pursue retaliation through grievance arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement, an NLRB unfair labor practice charge, or a statutory claim under applicable employment law, and in some cases through more than one of those paths simultaneously. We regularly handle matters that involve all three.

How Soon Should I Contact a Retaliation Attorney?

As soon as possible after an adverse action. NLRB unfair labor practice charges generally must be filed within six months of the unlawful act, and EEOC and PHRA charges carry their own deadlines that vary by agency and claim type. Confirm the applicable deadline with an attorney promptly, because missing it can eliminate your claim regardless of its merits.

Our retaliation attorneys in Philadelphia are ready to provide focused legal guidance. Call (215) 273-3491 to secure your consultation.

Start with a Confidential Consultation

Many workers hesitate to act out of concern for their job or reputation. We understand that, and we don’t push clients toward decisions before they’re ready. What we do is give you a clear picture of your situation, your options, and what pursuing each one looks like practically, so you can decide from a position of information rather than uncertainty.

If your employer has taken action against you for asserting your rights, contact Goodley McCarthy LLC for a focused, confidential assessment.

Reach out today to get clear answers from a workplace retaliation lawyer in Philadelphia who stands with workers. Call (215) 273-3491 to connect with our team.

Our Results
  • $126,353.87
    Int'l Painters & Allied Trades Indus. Pension Fund v. Madison Coatings Co., Inc., No. 17-1559, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188759 (D. Md. 2019)
    Int'l Painters & Allied Trades Indus. Pension Fund v. Madison Coatings Co., Inc., No. 17-1559, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188759 (D. Md. 2019) (summary judgment in favor of union benefits funds and against the employer for $126,353.87 in benefit fund contributions and other damages).
  • $225,000
    Bd. of Trs., Roofers Union Local 30 Combined Health & Welfare Fund v. Hughes Urethane Constr. Co., No. 19-1820, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204654 (E.D. Pa. 2020)
    Bd. of Trs., Roofers Union Local 30 Combined Health & Welfare Fund v. Hughes Urethane Constr. Co., No. 19-1820, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204654 (E.D. Pa. 2020) (summary judgment for union benefit funds and against the employer resulting in $225,000 judgment in favor of the funds).
  • Judgment Dismissal
    Juisti v. City of Chester, No. 18-2317, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160595 (E.D. Pa. 2019)
    Juisti v. City of Chester, No. 18-2317, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160595 (E.D. Pa. 2019) (summary judgment dismissal of breach of duty of fair representation suit brought against a labor union).
Your Legal Advocates in Philadelphia Contact Us at (215) 273-3491 Today

Hear From Our Happy Clients

At Goodley McCarthy LLC, your satisfaction is our priority! See for yourself what our clients have to say about working with us.

    “Thank you James Goodley, for taking on my case”
    “Truly amazing and I am grateful for all the hard work you've put into my case and for giving me a fresh beginning.”
    - Former Client
    “Thanks to Ryan's efforts, my case was resolved successfully!”
    “Ryan McCarthy was exceptional in resolving my FMLA case involving salary-exempt status and overtime laws in the IT field. He was responsive, professional, and fought diligently to secure a fair outcome.”
    - James
    “I would highly recommend!!”
    “Ryan McCarthy obtained a great settlement for me in a case of unpaid wages and tips against my employers. He was always available to answer any questions or concerns. I would highly recommend!!”
    - Mirella
    “Very professional and knowledgeable.”
    “5 stars. Goodley McCarthy LLC did great with a case for unpaid wages at a popular restaurant in DC. Let them know what’s going on, and they will handle the rest. Very professional and knowledgeable. Thank you to the team; also very helpful.”
    - Josmary K.
    “Fought for what we were owed!”
    “Goodley and McCarthy did an amazing job, getting my husband and me what we were owed for unpaid wages. I would recommend them to anyone.”
    - Tara H.
    “Great Legal Service and Experienced Lawyers”
    “Great legal service and experienced lawyers, especially James Goodley.”
    - Daisy R.
    “Very knowledgeable and responsive.”
    “Used Goodley McCarthy LLC for a case against a former employer. They were very knowledgeable and negotiated a settlement without a long trial. Very responsive to questions and kept everyone updated. Highly recommend and will use them if needed.”
    - Chad
    “Reached a Settlement Quickly and Efficiently”

    James represented me in a civil case involving my employer. Due to his experience and knowledge we were able to reach a settlement quickly and efficiently. I would highly recommend James to other prospective clients.

    - Jesse S.